This is draft machine translation.
For user Chris the Dane
"The state is obliged to look further" - state figures should behave, as the managers, hired by the citizens, and to act in interests of these citizens, but they, alas, want to be the creators. The citizens at us - not the hirers of authority{*power*}, and the material, with which works the master-creator. Our mentality! It seems, that now "above" of realism it is more.
The ideological principle (or confessor) can influence and the contents of the laws, and on their executing. Ours does not promote executing. It seems, that the state (as the machine) at us always was weak, and the community with е ё irrational was strong. The person was more controlled not by the state laws and police, and encirclement through "conscience" and " feeling of an elbow ". [Was thought: the princes only collected tribute...]. I think, that till now community prevents strengthening of the state - constantly attempts to change the laws by the concepts, constrains to be considered, and the state it does{*makes*}. Probably, the reason of rise of such mentality in the large territory, in absent-mindedness, that prevented to establish the precise order.
Christian submission that is impossible to be justified under the law, and it is possible only on pardon, well has got accustomed in Russia - on it{*him*} and we live! The one who has committed a crime, can pardon, and the one who did not commit, can punish - kindness (king-heartedness ***) has not deserved! It is required to default the laws and instructions, and to over-discharge, to try to please - to guess them, not knowing, that is required. The relation to crimes at us similarly to the relation to sins: each in what is guilty. The bottoms too are interested in it - communal people more habitually to be arranged under the heads, than to respect formal rules. Here and " thieves' concepts ", and " our special confessor "...
When any currents require{*demand*} possibilities for themselves, it is clear, but they more often attempt to force others to live according to the submissions. Naturally, there will be collisions. In it also are shown our mentality: (And the receiving of authority{*power*} is considered as a possibility to create the will. Authority{*power*} we - not technology, and creativity, where have a lot of place to an arbitrariness.
Not all dissatisfied can answer, what exactly they want to change. Even шарахаются from one idea to other - i.e., they have only any vague grievance. Ещ ё it is worse, if the grievance is coupled to availability at them of idea, which, in their opinion, the "correct" authority{*power*} should embody.
Yes, value at the different people - different! It is necessary to recognize it, and to not correct, to not result all in any uniform values, and to think of creation of possibilities, that the different people could live according to the values. Only how by him{*it*} to explain, that it is not necessary to impose the values to other, and what is not necessary to attempt all by him{*it*} to subordinate? While I see only one output - to constrain of such dangerous radicals. " By Violence to constrain? " - certainly! But this such violence, which is directional on maintaining of freedoms. Certainly, this violence should be reasonable.
The oversights of mentality should be debated. The oversights - not that, for the sake of conservation that everyone should suffer, as offer some especially spiritual. As a result of discussion, the mentality varies, becomes less иррационального, it is less than the mistakes.... It - something similar to a psychoanalysis. The people do not realize the reasons of the demands, and from it do{*make*} ещ ё more nonsenses. Reasons too can be silly. This nonsense should be realized to reject; " to pull out нечисть on light ". Such analysis - contrast to propagation, which addresses to иррациональному, uses delusions, and establishes ещ ё more mistakes.
*** Now, word "milost" is meaningful "kindness". Recently I have learned, that its old value - arbitrariness, lawlessness, limitlessness of authority. "Milosteviy" - not limited and not accountable. "Milosteviy king": wants - executes, wants - forgives: on the whim. "Not under the law, but on kindness" means "not under the law, and on lawless whim". It corresponds to comprehension, which I "have cleared of a peel".
Ananka The original (Rus)
© Lucipher 02.02.2009 agabaga|_x_|yandex.ru