rational vs sensual

The conflict between the "rational" and "sensual" people now has become aggravated. These categories of the people have different look to policy, freedoms, religion. As if speak in different languages and do not understand one another. The motives of the "sensual" people I consider as erroneous.

I is against use of feelings as arguments, especially - when speech go about limitation of freedom or invoking to actions. It is necessary to prove, instead of to convince! Many want to forbid all that it seems bad, immoral. For this purpose, he of the evidences does not require it. For them is not important that actions, which they want to forbid, nobody cause of harm - enough that they are condemned by religion or are not tradition, or calls in them unpleasant or forbidden associations. However, it is only part!

They want mutual guardianship! For me it means intervention into my life and coercion me to the responsi-bility for other people , more of the different interdictions and coercions, prosecutions... They require to act by concepts "people", " interests of the society ", - as if these constructions are more important than the people, of which they consist. Same - with concept "morals". "Moral" is grand mistake! If any rule is justified by a reality, it not a moral rule, and if not is justified by a reality - this bad rule. ("It is forbidden to steal because it poorly " - moral rule; " it is forbidden to steal because will punishment" - not moral rule, which acts, only while there is a threat of punishment, and this is the external interdiction, and not self-restraint, as "conscience")

Most important: by reasoning’s can correct the logic mistake, but "sensual" mistake cannot be corrected by reasoning’s! If to prove to them, that they do unprofitable business, it will not help: their ideals are higher than benefit. However, they not only are ready to suffer, but want to force others! They have the too large eagerness!

In Russian, "people" - almost "nation" - means a generality - one organism instead of multitude of separate men. In it is the large problem! These figures usually speak so, as if "people" is very important organism, for the sake of which the separate men should sacrifice the interests. I consider that unity as fiction and political slyness. "Sensual" people maintain this fraud, as they would like unity, narrowness, "family". Necessary to understand: "people = multitude of men"! I speak: People are an enemy of the person!

One more example - "family's values": moral-sensual fools invoke to conserve family, even if in such family to live poorly, as if the family exists for the sake of itself, instead of for convenience of the members of family!

To live so, the qualities are necessary: "self-sacrifice" and "humility". These qualities - subject of admiration for "sensual". Looking on sufferings, they admire "Ah, what a beautiful self-sacrifice! Ah, what meekly suffers!". The pity masks cruelty; sensual vicious languor, they swallow a saliva. They also imagine more severe sufferings, and wish to a victim to undergo them. It compassion - their one more value...

Intuition or rational

laws vs moral

Some equate the state law to moral... However, a law is external interdiction, is circumstance, with which it is necessary to obey, but it is possible to be not consent. Morale standards are in-house interdictions that are providing even blocking the ideas. Setting up of moral is same totalitarianism. The purpose - to make of the person unfit on a "bad" act, and even on a thought about it. Even the question "why?" is impermissible - it shows and distributes doubt and "sin". The moral standards require believe and general support! It seems by ideal, when the people will be guided by moral, but think, what strict should be of dogmatism, as standards should be driven in, and what censorship, struggle with a dissent and with "sin" etc. is required. Moral - management by ideas and emotions of the people; enforcing unity of moral is the very cruel form of a totalitarianism! The moral is similar a libotomy!

Look still: Increase of ambiguity
Moral censorship and morale responsibility